LLM Board
Ask a question and get diverse perspectives from multiple AI models, synthesized into a clear recommendation.
Council — All models answer in parallel, then the Chairman synthesizes a consensus.
Deep Brainstorm — 3 rounds of debate. Models critique each other and revise their positions before the Chairman produces a merged decision brief.
Deep Brainstorm — 3 rounds of debate. Models critique each other and revise their positions before the Chairman produces a merged decision brief.
Medium — Models respond, Chairman synthesizes directly. Fast, good for most questions.
High — Adds an anonymized peer-ranking stage. Each model ranks all responses blindly, and the Chairman uses those scores to weigh the synthesis. More rigorous, costs ~2x more.
High — Adds an anonymized peer-ranking stage. Each model ranks all responses blindly, and the Chairman uses those scores to weigh the synthesis. More rigorous, costs ~2x more.
Normal — Each model uses half its output capacity with standard reasoning. Good balance of depth and cost.
High effort — Full output capacity per model (up to 128k tokens) with deep reasoning enabled. Maximum depth, higher cost.
High effort — Full output capacity per model (up to 128k tokens) with deep reasoning enabled. Maximum depth, higher cost.